BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.6.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news1615@dslw.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20251030T142318
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20251105T101500
SUMMARY:"Reading DeLillo Again: Irony\, Media\, Visual Art"
DESCRIPTION:Good literature bears many re-readings - so they say - but what
  actually happens when one re-reads (and more than once)? There is an exqu
 isite ambivalence involved in the act of repeated readings of the same lit
 erary work since it might lead both to affirmation and revision\, merging 
 them in unstable\, probably volatile constellations which eventually refle
 ct on the situatedness of reading in general. In the case of Don DeLillo\,
  re-reading in our current situation must negotiate the historical and cul
 tural context of the writing (and its first reception) with our current si
 tuation - in what way then does the historical DeLillo speak to us in our 
 time - and what are the conditions of our reading?\\r\\nI would like to di
 scuss these questions further (including their validity for the critical s
 tudy of literary reading) in talking\, alas rather briefly\, about three d
 ominant aspects which might help to bridge the gap between the historical 
 and the topical DeLillo\, i.e. the novel in the context of (re-) mediation
 \, the merging of the dramatic and the ironic as a diagnostic mode\, and f
 inally\, the inherent visuality of literary writing and reading.\\r\\nThe 
 talk is meant as an incentive - for re-reading\, certainly - and an invita
 tion to reflect and discuss the act of reading literature apart from its i
 nstrumentalisation and professionalisation in academic and critical contex
 ts - the talk thus can only stay very much within the hypothetical\, invit
 ing comparison and contrast\, as well as commentary based on others's read
 ings.\\r\\n----------\\r\\nAs to preparing for the talk\, I would suggest 
 to think about and re-read any specific passage(s) from DeLillo's fiction 
 which has become 'stuck' in our reading memory\, the most memorable moment
 s of your reading experience. And if you can\, bring them along to the ses
 sion.
X-ALT-DESC:<p>Good literature bears many re-readings - so they say - but wh
 at actually happens when one re-reads (and more than once)? There is an ex
 quisite ambivalence involved in the act of repeated readings of the same l
 iterary work since it might lead both to affirmation and revision\, mergin
 g them in unstable\, probably volatile constellations which eventually ref
 lect on the situatedness of reading in general. In the case of Don DeLillo
 \, re-reading in our current situation must negotiate the historical and c
 ultural context of the writing (and its first reception) with our current 
 situation - in what way then does the historical DeLillo speak to us in ou
 r time - and what are the conditions of our reading?</p>\n<p>I would like 
 to discuss these questions further (including their validity for the criti
 cal study of literary reading) in talking\, alas rather briefly\, about th
 ree dominant aspects which might help to bridge the gap between the histor
 ical and the topical DeLillo\, i.e. the novel in the context of (re-) medi
 ation\, the merging of the dramatic and the ironic as a diagnostic mode\, 
 and finally\, the inherent visuality of literary writing and reading.</p>\
 n<p>The talk is meant as an incentive - for re-reading\, certainly - and a
 n invitation to reflect and discuss the act of reading literature apart fr
 om its instrumentalisation and professionalisation in academic and critica
 l contexts - the talk thus can only stay very much within the hypothetical
 \, inviting comparison and contrast\, as well as commentary based on other
 s's readings.</p>\n<p>----------</p>\n<p>As to preparing for the talk\, I 
 would suggest to think about and re-read any specific passage(s) from DeLi
 llo's fiction which has become 'stuck' in our reading memory\, the most me
 morable moments of your reading experience. And if you can\, bring them al
 ong to the session.</p>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20251105T120000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
